[ Home | TOC | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: RntUyolDmZaS
Date: 12 Jul 2009
Time: 06:37:17
Remote Name: 93.174.93.233
Zinedine Zidane!, <a href=http://travel.agoda.com/members/Cialis.aspx>Cialis</a> , [url=http://travel.agoda.com/members/Cialis.aspx]Cialis[/url] , http://travel.agoda.com/members/Cialis.aspx - Cialis , <a href=http://casastart.org/members/huiCialis.aspx>Cialis</a> , [url=http://casastart.org/members/huiCialis.aspx]Cialis[/url] , http://casastart.org/members/huiCialis.aspx - Cialis ,
From: colossalcumshots
Date: 22 Nov 2016
Time: 15:59:13
Remote Name: 170.150.116.103
Colossal Cumshots Live Passwords - http://colossalcumshots.com/ps_10027_A
From: NY
Date: 01 Sep 2014
Time: 10:42:56
Remote Name: 93.115.94.85
I sing in a choir http://www.fiendishsudoku.com/plumbo-casino/ plumbo casino Bottom line the guy was in his own house in his own room alone and was merely suspected of having pointed a gun at two people (for reasons unknown–but possibly in self defense). That doesn’t merit a death sentence. Not responding to SWAT team orders (particularly when one is “close to deaf in both ears”) also doesn’t merit a death sentence. The SWAT team had no exigent circumstances to enter the home, no warrant, and plenty of options that did not involve the use of lethal force. That force began with the use of a “distraction device”–as stun grenades can injure, maim, and kill. So although SWAT would like to claim that the man initiated by opening fire, the truth is that SWAT initiated by trying to breach and unlawfully enter a man’s home.